Craig Posted June 11, 2013 Report Share Posted June 11, 2013 Oh No !!!!!!!!! Crazy 435 Rest In Peace My quest continues. Help me out guys There just has to be something longer than this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wmclarenf1 Posted June 11, 2013 Report Share Posted June 11, 2013 Lol! Good one Craig! Was wondering what your number 1 is and was expecting a different head altogether! Looks like a shaft that was pulled one too times or a bad prep and install. Thanks again and cheers for your time and effort with your top 10. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiromikey Posted June 11, 2013 Report Share Posted June 11, 2013 There just has to be something longer than this nope, i can now confirm your list...there is nothing longer! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robb40 Posted June 11, 2013 Report Share Posted June 11, 2013 until proven otherwise the Jbeam 435 is the distance king! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIduffer Posted June 11, 2013 Report Share Posted June 11, 2013 (edited) until proven otherwise the Jbeam 435 is the distance king! The jBeam 435 is horrible, Crazy 435 is where it is at... Edited June 11, 2013 by RIduffer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiromikey Posted June 11, 2013 Report Share Posted June 11, 2013 The jBeam 435 is horrible, Crazy 435 is where it is at... i have one of each and once i repainted the jbeam it's performance matched the crazy... ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rb2235 Posted June 11, 2013 Report Share Posted June 11, 2013 There is no difference between the 2. JBeam makes both. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiromikey Posted June 11, 2013 Report Share Posted June 11, 2013 There is no difference between the 2. JBeam makes both. duffer showed me the non-compete clause that stipulated jbeam had to use performance reducing paint if they wanted to release the model under their name. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supo Posted June 12, 2013 Report Share Posted June 12, 2013 hahhahah i think it was a rougher paint job to create more friction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIduffer Posted June 12, 2013 Report Share Posted June 12, 2013 hahhahah i think it was a rougher paint job to create more friction. It also increased drag reducing the SS by as much as 3%. That slower speed was intended to increase the release timing of the shaft causing suboptimal contact quality. Net impact was an 8 yd reduction in distance and 15% increase in dispersion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Posted August 7, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 Thought I would update this Going to do some reviews when I get time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wmclarenf1 Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 Looking forward to it Craig! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supo Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 now thats a photo finish! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomcat Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 jbeam 435 R? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm3 Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 I jumped on this bandwagon and am not looking back, well, I look back to see how far ahead I am of my playing partners. I really love this driver and when hit square on the face, it is the longest of the long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.