polar240 Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 Which of the following has a lower/more penetrating ball flight, NS Pro 950GH or S200? I currently use px 5.5 and the ball flight is perfect. Are any of the above comparable? Steven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bat Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 The S200 has a lower ball flight for me than the 950GH. Bat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idrive Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 The S200 has a lower ball flight for me than the 950GH.Bat + 1 The 950GH is a much higher ball flight compared to the S200's I have found the S200 (for me) to have one of the lowest trajectories of all of the shafts I have played. I have two sets of Irons shafted with the S200's Initially I was considering just changing them out. After playing with them a copuple of times I have to admit that I really like the shafts. At this point the only shaft (for my Irons) I prefer over the S200's are the Black Golds. Also, I find I can't feel or notice a discernable difference between the S200 and S300's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gocchin Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 The two shafts are definitely very different starting with weight alone which will make the way they play different from one another. The S200 is over 20g heavier each shaft which usually translates into less torque and stiffer feel. Definitely lower trajectory on the S200's. As idrive mentioned a great alternative to px 5.5's would be stiff Black Golds or stiff NS Pro 1150's. They would be closer in weight range and trajectory characteristics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.