pingwrx Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 I'm looking to pull the trigger on one of these sets. I'm just curious on how they set up at address. I have played the TS202 and TS X-blade CB 08 in the past. And it looks like based on what I have read, the 701's set up like Xblade CB O8 and the 701G's set up like the TS202s. Can anybody confirm this? Thanks in advance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gocchin Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 They both (701 and 701G) set up quite similar. Compact and thin top line with a touch more offset for tne 701G from the top. I would say the 701G is slightly smaller than the 202 (though it has been a long time since I saw a 202) but with new technology and design probably gives as much forgiveness. I took pics at address at the show. Don't use these pics to compare size as the camera was at different distances from each iron but you get an idea of how they look at setup. 701: 701G: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bat Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 Although the 701 has a bit less offset than the 701G, BOTH are very similar in size to the X-Blade CB which is MUCH smaller than the TS-202. The closest you'll get to the TS-202 from address is the NEW X-Blade GR C-1. The GR P-1 actually has a little bit less offset and the ViQ Forged is a tad bigger. If you're like me and hates the Red "GR" Graphic in the cavity of the new GRs you may also want to consider the older 2008 X-Blade GR Black. It's smaller than the TS-202 but more forgiving than the X-Blade CBs. If you can find it, the First X-Blade GR has even less offset but are also a bit less forgiving. FWIW, my previous irons before these Epons were the X-Blade CB1 and the TS-202. Bat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.