gburgs Posted October 8, 2006 Report Share Posted October 8, 2006 The MR23 CB and Z101 Tourstage irons are very similar in shape and design to the naked eye. The cavities are cut very similar, headshape very close, and both incorporate tungsten in the long irons. For those who have played them both, can you give your opinions on why you liked one over the other? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pureblade Posted October 10, 2006 Report Share Posted October 10, 2006 I played the MR23s about 4 years ago, and the z101s are still in one of my bags. All I can remember about the MR23s is that they are MUCH shorter heel-to-toe. Therefore, even though they are a CB design, the compact head made the sweet spot TINY. I just didn't feel confident with them, and I would go so far as to say that modern blades with longer heel-to-toe lengths and strategically placed weight (or "muscle" in Mizuno-speak) are more forgiving. My 2 cents... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+TourSpecGolfer Posted October 10, 2006 Report Share Posted October 10, 2006 I agree Z101 is a classic, more forgiving than the MR-23 and a design we could see soon in the bridgestone line up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.