Eca Posted January 31, 2013 Report Share Posted January 31, 2013 Hi all, Kinda getting the itch to get one of these. Can Anyone make a comparison between 2 or all if you used them. Some info I wouldn't mind getting; - least offset - turf interaction / which has most bounce - feel is quite subjective but wouldn't mind hearing your views - consistency / forgiveness / dispersion Thanks in advance Eric Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoon Posted January 31, 2013 Report Share Posted January 31, 2013 Cant comment on the romaro the other two yes. Pagng stew pls come over. The kamuis are LOOoong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eca Posted January 31, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2013 Thanks C, can u compare the two? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdGolf Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 E - how the H compare to em baby blades?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wmclarenf1 Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 Hi E, You know my stand on the 3 and if the 302s are similar to the Technica Pro Is which I think they are, then you also know where I stand on the Hs. Can;t comment on the Kamui irons as I have not hit them yet. Sorry can't be of much help here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idrive Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 Haven't played the Kamui's, but the biggest dif. between the 302 and H's is feel. Sound. The H's are more blade like than the 302's. H's are smaller. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eca Posted February 1, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 (edited) Ed, feel/sound almost same, head of BB is much smaller. Agree with Jeff, it is a blade like feel & performane but gives the impression it's more Forgiving. BB is so small that just about the whole grooved area is the 'hit' area lol. H is definitely a class act, but I like the look of the Other two too Edited February 1, 2013 by Eca Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiromikey Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 how's the offset and forgiveness compared between the h's and 302's? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supo Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 kamui kp101 i thin i did a huge post on these a cpl of days ago. .go check what i said. HUGE fan of these irons prefer them to the 302s.. not gettitgn the romoros .,dont like the look of them , to osqaure for my weye. the kps are rounded. id bet the romoaros are just the same feel as the kamuis id bet they ar ever ysimilar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wmclarenf1 Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 The kamuis are LOOoong That's because they are very strong lofted. Kamui PW is 44 vs 46 for most JDMs and 48 for traditional PWs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gian11 Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 I am very curious about the feel of the 302's. Are they similar with the 901? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eca Posted February 1, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 kamui kp101 i thin i did a huge post on these a cpl of days ago. .go check what i said. HUGE fan of these irons prefer them to the 302s.. not gettitgn the romoros .,dont like the look of them , to osqaure for my weye. the kps are rounded. id bet the romoaros are just the same feel as the kamuis id bet they ar ever ysimilar Thanks Stew. Found it under shaft comparison post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supo Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 no i did one heaed kamui pro kpx 101 check that i thunk i did a big one a cplof times..., Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supo Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 http://forum.tourspecgolf.com/topic/32940-kamui-pro-kp-101-irons/ here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eca Posted February 4, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 4, 2013 Thanks Stew, that is an awesome review. You mentioned something about the look of the hosel at address which I also noticed on the photo at the proshop. I thought it might just be an angle. Would you happen to have another photo a address with a ball a bit further away than in your review? The offset is definitely minimal ie vs 302 etc? Thanks again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supo Posted February 4, 2013 Report Share Posted February 4, 2013 its only differnt to others when ur hititng numerous irons like i do in a test, and your closely looking at them. one agianst the other on saturday inm y match they were not noticeably big nor small, i thought the offset on these was close to nothing. thye played very well. in some hideous conditions sat morn, they are def 1/2-1 club stronger than my others. and flight on them is low/mid with the monaccos. the feel of them is right up there. taking an x flex shaft in anything kinda kiils any nice feel ur exepcting to get, but these were as good as u can expect. the wind got a cpl of them that i didnt come thru properly that ordinaril y wudda just fell right, but on sat i got killed. them shafts aint for sissys.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eca Posted February 4, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 4, 2013 Cool. Very helpful info.. Thanks Stew. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.