played both yesterday 9 each grip iomic absolute, ust frequescy filter 34 inch lie the same 4* 71*

milling is similar but the kitada feels just a bit harder, the golds was lighter , higher and more brick like , the kitada is slightyl lower sleeker and longer looking. prob isnt but thats how it looks in cpmarison.

prefeed the lookatadress of the kitada, but the golds had a better overall feel.

distance control was better with the kitada but the golds i found ebtter accuracy.

both dont suit my eye tho. i much prefed the look of the matsumoto mc-05 but the feel cant compete

both golds and kitada were much nicer on impact, but the best puttign idid was with the old trusty hiro.

for the right guy both theseputters wil INSTANTLY end ur putter search i dont think ive hit anything "better" but for me its 100% about the look at adress

gee im a tough marker. they are both incredible, if i had to take one of these id take the goldsand get sued to it bec it lighter by a whisker and inside 10 feet i missed better.

yep 2 thumbs up. they are both greta.

price differntial here is imense.. the kitada isnt worse and its lots cheaper.

saying that........ id still take the golds.

sayingthat............. id still take the hiro!

Edited February 3, 201312 yr by supo67

I'm sorry the Kitada does to suit to best Stew but play what works.

i love it.. ill def take it away with m bec of the way it feels o nthe ball.

Both have the ingredient sus303

Loving the rounded bumpers on the Kitada, but overall the GF would be my choice. :)

not to threadjack, but does anyone know if Gold´s will do a Cameron 009 / Byrond DH-89 / Ping Scottsdale Anser shape?

Loving the rounded bumpers on the Kitada, but overall the GF would be my choice. :) not to threadjack, but does anyone know if Gold´s will do a Cameron 009 / Byrond DH-89 / Ping Scottsdale Anser shape?

I think Golds will do anyone and anything ... LOL