rexwrx

http://golftaiken.nikkansports.com/2016/08/5660.html Is Domo. August 26, 2016 is PRGR new model "RS" series will be released, but it is finally entered the Iron. "RS" is the Iron "iD Nabla RS" Iron same "Forged" Iron, two models of "titanium face" Iron is available. First, let's say from the "Forged" Iron !! First of all, let's say from the looks. Preceded by the I'm triangle of back face was the characteristic. This "RS Forged" Iron is the appearance cavity iron, but as of the predecessor same hollow structure. Faces when compared to its predecessor, it felt like had become a compact feel a little toe-heel. Saul is Semiwaido, but the leading edge is also the trailing edge also had been considerably cut. This is than implanted coming out of the goodness of the, you would be aware that that will somewhat slipped even I Duff. The neck is I guess is almost straight. Predecessor, but it felt like Vance is large set, I did not feel too much Vance in this "RS Forged" Iron. Poised to try and like this. It is more compact than its predecessor. Predecessor, but the top line is looked thicker, this "RS Forged" Iron felt also seems to have been devised that somewhat look sharp. It was to test hitting this time, the original steel shaft "spec steel Ⅲver.2" M-43 mounted model of the # 7. Specs, loft angle of 32 degrees, lie angle 62 degrees, length of 36.75 inches, total weight 420g, balance D1. Shaft specifications, weight 94g, torque 1.9, the original tone. Test hitting venue Tokyo Metro Green Toyocho, the ball two-piece ball use. First of all sense of I have is slightly lighter in weight basis. Wood-based Similarly, grip was just the right thickness of the feeling. When I was Shinara the shaft, intermediate I felt bow. And try to practice swing, the feeling of the head in the crosscut is but I felt disappear and fluoride, the fast type of crosscut as I was shaking likely image without delay pretend. When I actually hit, but feel it was a pretty good feeling in the mild, I think I know the predecessor same hollow structure. This, was forgotten when to test hitting. That the Forged model, we can see that is equivalent stuck to feel, I do not notice unless said that the hollow structure. And in writing the manuscript try to re-read your own blog, I was surprised to myself you're writing the same kind of thing in the predecessor (sweat) Ballistic data of Sky track is like this That each sphere data was here. [3 balls average] HS38.6m / s, initial velocity 49.1m / s, launch angle 16.8 degrees, back spin amount 5638.9rpm, side spin -646.6rpm, flying distance 147.0m (160.7y) [Best] HS38.6m / s , initial velocity 49.2m / s, launch angle 17.3 degrees, back spin amount 5222.7rpm, side spin -675.2rpm, flying distance 148.3m (162.1y) It was a fairly mild system is hitting feel. In the driver & FW same chunky impact, I feel riding feeling of the face is good. If it is said that the hollow structure, I felt to treble system in which calm think you !! slapping sound and not notice at all. Trajectory in such a feeling The Sky track data is here. Trajectory, it was a high trajectory of undisputed. Well, I think that it is a reasonable height Given the 32-degree loft. I think that it is a good feeling without go up spin amount blow but, 5300rpm in the Sky track and generous Kana ··· ※ 148.9m = 162.8y Dedama is a trend, but the draw based on my swing. Operability with a straight neck is a high likely, but basically I think the model that hold on to automatic. Shaft behavior, but I feel middle bends, it was also a little softer image is in spite of the steel shaft S. But, pretend disconnect was a nice touch! As far as this time I was test hitting, recommended for HS42 ~ 43m / s Atari in this spec. Anyway, the player feeling but is happy that it is iron in !! automatic club Hydro over the strike atmosphere, including that appearance is swung slightly sharp direction, with feelings in the feeling-oriented, including hitting feel I recommend. <PRGR "RS Forged" Iron> ￭ KAZ'S impression (10-point scale) ▽ distance: 8 ▽ up-friendliness: 10 ▽ operability: 8 ▽ poised Ease: 9 ▽ of feel softness: 10 ▽ acceptable mistakes degrees: 9 ￭ head: (# 4 to # 9) body = soft iron (S25C), face = maraging steel (ES235), insert material = vibration damping material. (PW, 51 degrees, 57 degrees) body & face = soft iron (S25C). Weight = tungsten rubber (51 degrees, 57 degrees only) ￭ shaft (weight / torque / tone): steel shaft "Dynamic Gold" (S200 = 117g / 1.5 / original tone), "KBS Tour 105" (S = 101g / 1.7 / mid-tone), "spec steel ⅲVer.2 M-46" (SX = 103g / 1.7 / original tone), "the M-43" (S = 94g / 1.9 / original tone), "the M-40" (SR = 85g / 2.2 / original tone) ※ specifications # 7 mounted model

Really? Nobody?

Can anyone confirm that they are taper tip for sure? Thanks for the help

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=e...field%26hl%3Den Click any of the tabs on the left

They own the Makser air-flow crown design. Great looking head.

The KiaMa Daytona looks fantastic. Sign me up.

Wouldn't Golf Magazine likely say the same thing about Golf Digest, or vice versa? Just a thought...

Seems like a fairly thorough test, with many iron models having been reviewed. The testers appear to be value conscious in their grading, but Epon's are still ranked much lower than the Snake Eyes 675B for instance, in both value and feel. Surprising. http://www.todaysgolfer.co.uk/Golf/News/se...amp;R=EPI-22716 Epon AF-301 TG rating rating is 2.5/5 Stars These top-end forgings performed reasonably well in our test, but they failed to stand out in any department and lost crucial marks in the value category. Our testers questioned if the huge pricetag was worth it, as there seemed no obvious payback in actual performance or results, and there were even some reports of a harsh and unforgiving feel. But, these are still seriously high-quality clubs with sleek and stylish looks, giving plenty of niche appeal, and are clearly aimed at the discerning golfer looking for something a little different. Snake Eyes 675B TG rating rating is 4/5 Stars Only just pipped to our Bronze award, the 675 won admirers in our test and our test pro loved its soft feel and all-round performance. Players will appreciate the forgiveness on off-centre hits, while the design maintains a traditional appearance, with a thin top line, bevelled Tour-grind sole and minimal offset. With a shiny chrome finish, this is a real players’ club and gave solid results. We tested the musclebacks, but the 675C cavity backs are also available for more forgiveness. Both can be combined to create a combo set.

Ha- I initially saw the light reflection as a Gold alignment aid. Sorry bout that.

Looks alright other than the alignment aid being way out on the toe.

AND with SQ2 Fairway:

Looks like it might be this Prototype: http://www.usga.org/equipment/images/conf_.../R2008-0351.jpg

Hard to tell what the head is, but that's definitely the new UST Axiv shaft being tested on tour. Any thoughts on what the head might be?

Cool - looks like you can now subscribe through Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Golf-Digest-Japanese...n/dp/B00007LND5

Sure looks like they consulted the Nike design department on this one...

The GeoTech sure looks like and interesting option: http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=e...cial%26hs%3DbdM

Looks to have the Cami&Co higher toe profile- sign me up!

See this thread for further MTI wedge pics. I brought it up earlier- but there seemed to be very little interest. http://forum.tourspecgolf.com/index.php?showtopic=24480

The grind actually looks very similar to the Cleveland DSG.

I asked this question myself- but there doesn't seem to be much interest. http://forum.tourspecgolf.com/index.php?showtopic=24480

Getting antsy here fellas...

Anybody?

You gotta love Babelfish: http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=e...cial%26hs%3DtVg

Tanihara and Hiratsuka are both sporting some industrial looking MTI type-S wedges- as can be viewed and zoomed in on here: http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=e...cial%26hs%3D8X9 Any word on availability and origin?