seesawgolfer

I agree with this 100%. The Carbon steel has a nice softer feel. The SUS303 has a more solid and firm *tink*. But it depends on personal preference.

I only go with the round. The ribbed throws me off when trying to do different types of shots with slightly different grip position.

Not really feeling the cavity as if they are trying too hard to make it look cool. does that Cavity bulge help a certain swing type? Or is it just for appearance?

Thanks for the post! I was debating on 3 shafts for my af driver, I got it narrowed down to 2 thanks to you post.

I played both the Epon 302 and TM burner TP. Mostly it is personal preference. One thing I did notice that the Epons felt much softer than the TM Buner TPs on contact.

Fourteen really knows how to design their products. The finish is Nice too!

#1: The price is a major flag to be suspicious. #2: Heads only is another ALERT! (for brands that do not sell head only.) #3: How the product looks. May look cheaper. Or small differences in emblems, shape, graphics, etc.

I agree. The head size is not overly large. Just a smidge over the standard size. I really don't notice it when in play.

Ive been using these wedges for several months now. I like the fact they are conforming to the grooves rule, but i honestly can't tell the difference in spin between these and my old seida wedges i've had for a couple years. perhaps, the grooves got worn down a bit by use, but i don't see much of a difference on the green. The rupas has good spin, in fact i had a tournament where my partner nudged me asking if they were conforming! I haven't experienced much rust, nothing that can't be removed quickly. I'm one of those guys that can't stand the rust, but this wedge is ok with me. As for hitablity, I have consistent ball striking already so i really can't comment on that. I do recommend these for those that need to change to conforming grooves but don't want to miss out on the spin.