Hi all,

Kinda getting the itch to get one of these. Can Anyone make a comparison between 2 or all if you used them.

Some info I wouldn't mind getting;

- least offset

- turf interaction / which has most bounce

- feel is quite subjective but wouldn't mind hearing your views

- consistency / forgiveness / dispersion

Thanks in advance

Eric

Cant comment on the romaro the other two yes.

Pagng stew pls come over.

The kamuis are LOOoong

Thanks C, can u compare the two?

E - how the H compare to em baby blades??

Hi E,

You know my stand on the 3 and if the 302s are similar to the Technica Pro Is which I think they are, then you also know where I stand on the Hs. Can;t comment on the Kamui irons as I have not hit them yet. Sorry can't be of much help here.

Haven't played the Kamui's,

but the biggest dif. between the 302 and H's is feel. Sound.

The H's are more blade like than the 302's. H's are smaller.

Ed, feel/sound almost same, head of BB is much smaller.

Agree with Jeff, it is a blade like feel & performane but gives the impression it's more

Forgiving. BB is so small that just about the whole grooved area is the 'hit' area lol.

H is definitely a class act, but I like the look of the

Other two too

Edited February 1, 201312 yr by Eca

how's the offset and forgiveness compared between the h's and 302's?

kamui kp101

i thin i did a huge post on these a cpl of days ago. .go check what i said.

HUGE fan of these irons

prefer them to the 302s.. not gettitgn the romoros .,dont like the look of them , to osqaure for my weye. the kps are rounded.

id bet the romoaros are just the same feel as the kamuis id bet they ar ever ysimilar

The kamuis are LOOoong

That's because they are very strong lofted. Kamui PW is 44 vs 46 for most JDMs and 48 for traditional PWs.

I am very curious about the feel of the 302's. Are they similar with the 901?

kamui kp101

i thin i did a huge post on these a cpl of days ago. .go check what i said.

HUGE fan of these irons

prefer them to the 302s.. not gettitgn the romoros .,dont like the look of them , to osqaure for my weye. the kps are rounded.

id bet the romoaros are just the same feel as the kamuis id bet they ar ever ysimilar

Thanks Stew.

Found it under shaft comparison post.

no i did one heaed kamui pro kpx 101 check that i thunk i did a big one a cplof times...,

http://forum.tourspecgolf.com/topic/32940-kamui-pro-kp-101-irons/

here

Thanks Stew, that is an awesome review.

You mentioned something about the look of the hosel at address which I also noticed on the photo at the proshop. I thought it might just be an angle. Would you happen to have another photo a address with a ball a bit further away than in your review?

The offset is definitely minimal ie vs 302 etc?

Thanks again.

its only differnt to others when ur hititng numerous irons like i do in a test, and your closely looking at them. one agianst the other

on saturday inm y match they were not noticeably big nor small, i thought the offset on these was close to nothing.

thye played very well. in some hideous conditions sat morn, they are def 1/2-1 club stronger than my others. and flight on them is low/mid with the monaccos. the feel of them is right up there. taking an x flex shaft in anything kinda kiils any nice feel ur exepcting to get, but these were as good as u can expect. the wind got a cpl of them that i didnt come thru properly that ordinaril y wudda just fell right, but on sat i got killed. them shafts aint for sissys..

Cool. Very helpful info.. Thanks Stew.