Miura MG 5005 v Titleist T MB v Crazy Limited MB relative to: feel, forgiveness, distance, playability?

Thanks!

Edited September 13, 20159 yr by Exhaloprez

I've played all 3 and the titleist t MB wins hands down, it is more forgiving and longer loft for loft, the miura and the crazy are both better looking and a sweet spot hit with the crazy is very satisfying but in terms of overall performance, the titleist has it all, it can perform like a blade but has the forgiveness of a GI and it is very user friendly and looks great at address

Edited September 13, 20159 yr by robbie

I've played all 3 and the titleist t MB wins hands down, it is more forgiving and longer loft for loft, the miura and the crazy are both better looking and a sweet spot hit with the crazy is very satisfying but in terms of overall performance, the titleist has it all, it can perform like a blade but has the forgiveness of a GI and it is very user friendly and looks great at address

exactly T-MB wins in all categories other than the pureness of the Crazy MB.

Oddly we have many customers who pass on the T-MB because it is stainless steel, if they hit it they would think it's soft forged.

hmmmmm not sure if they are a good comparison really ,

these are 3 VERY differnt style blades.

the titleist is almost like a filled in caivty back, its got a lot of forgivness, very rounded and thick

the miura is a minisucle original blade

and the crazy is a "big " blade.

i was going to get the titleists, but the shape totally threw me off.

i immedialty thought it u play golf on really thick ,soft spongey , water alden courses these might be all time.

i dont, so i was immediatly offput by the shape.

the other 2 cud be better, if ur deciosin is based on size.

of those 2 id take the crazies, bec they are a bit differnt.

but id tke the miuraisms over the crazies equally. if they were my thing.

the 3 u mentioned are in thier own category

ask what u want

thick fogriness.

big blade,

tiny blade.