+TourSpecGolfer Posted May 23, 2016 Report Share Posted May 23, 2016 I think I used the wrong word. By stable I mean consistent. If your swing not the same most of the time the 7D might not be right. Better get a lessons till swing is consistent. I would love to try the Crazy 9 series but ultimately I'll probably get fit at 7D in Tokyo soon. I play with some of the pro from Asian tour. Some, very very few, get endorsed by Epon and use their clubs on tour. Most pros same that tech aren't in the head anymore. As long as they look visually fine, they focus more on the shaft. By that I assume tech is in shaft rather than head. Because higher handicap players are not consistent we have found a spin reducing shaft that is anti slice and squares up quickly is a very big deal. Head's matter especially for better players it's about 50% of the equation. For the best players even the variance in the tolerance & CT makes a difference so yes I'm saying the soft face thing is a problem, even CT if 2 drivers have 20pts difference in CT distance gain/loss is noticeable. Only when all things are equal then the top heads are all within 5-10yds of each other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D22marshall Posted May 24, 2016 Report Share Posted May 24, 2016 Someone may have a confession that he has a 105 in route, wait and see if he owns up to it??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dnq22 Posted May 24, 2016 Author Report Share Posted May 24, 2016 Yep. Looking forward to seeing if I can get it to work. Suspect the shaft choice will be the big thing there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie Posted May 24, 2016 Report Share Posted May 24, 2016 Nice one Dave , really keen to hear how it compares to your 103 Mate ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hutch Posted May 24, 2016 Report Share Posted May 24, 2016 ;) this will be good...cant waitforthe review Dave. Either way you will have a dilemma every weekend...all be it a good one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dnq22 Posted May 24, 2016 Author Report Share Posted May 24, 2016 Thanks gents, looking forward to the selection process. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D22marshall Posted May 31, 2016 Report Share Posted May 31, 2016 A few top comparisons to the 103. 105 a bit pointer and 103 a rounder shape more classic look Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dnq22 Posted May 31, 2016 Author Report Share Posted May 31, 2016 Thanks Deano, appreciate it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie Posted May 31, 2016 Report Share Posted May 31, 2016 Maybe it's a combination of the point of the 105 and the matt finish of the 103 but the 105 looks smaller in the photos . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hutch Posted May 31, 2016 Report Share Posted May 31, 2016 They are shallower through the back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.