Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Does anyone have any info about the TourStage F-ST+ fairway woods?

I couldn't find it on the Bridgestone website online catalog.

  • Author

Thanks FAQ

I checked out the online 2004 catalog, but I must be looking in the wrong place?

I can see the F-ST and F-HT fairway woods listed there, but I can't seem to locate the F-ST+ model. I think it's basically a non-bore thru version of the regular F-ST? I'm not sure?

Thanks FAQ

I checked out the online 2004 catalog, but I must be looking in the wrong place?

I can see the F-ST and F-HT fairway woods listed there, but I can't seem to locate the F-ST+ model. I think it's basically a non-bore thru version of the regular F-ST? I'm not sure?

Isn't the F-ST+ being tested on the JPGA right now? Its titanium with a non bore thru.

  • 1 month later...

I think the pics on pro support are of the F-HT+. From the Info I'm getting from the tour these are being tested on the JPGA and will be returned to Bridgestone's manufacturer for stress testing and quality issues to make sure the final product is durable.

Whichever model that may be, it appears to be deeper-faced than the current models? Although I understand why low profile fairway woods have been popular, I've always preferred a deeper face. Feels much more solid and more versatile to me. Alwyas thought that if a player had truoble generating height, the simple solution was to go for a higher loft.

Have to say that the wood in those pictures looks very sweet.

Chris, aside from the Fourteen proto driver which you've raved about, have you tried their fairway wood?

Didier

I have never tried the new Fourteen FW but from what I read it looks large from address and is geared toward the mid handicap level player.

The current FS-T is not a pancake, like MR-23 and its not a DF, like an ERC wood. I thought it was the perfect size, and I'm curious how they could improve it.

The current FS-T is not a pancake, like MR-23 and its not a DF, like an ERC wood.  I thought it was the perfect size, and I'm curious how they could improve it.

Same here...well, maybe if they were square instead of .5* closed. Still I'm pretty damned pleased with my original.

The current FS-T is not a pancake, like MR-23 and its not a DF, like an ERC wood.  I thought it was the perfect size, and I'm curious how they could improve it.

Same here...well, maybe if they were square instead of .5* closed. Still I'm pretty damned pleased with my original.

Didn't mean to imply that the F-ST was low-profile - should have started a new paragraph. I still play mine and am very happy with it as well although the face really gets marked up and it will soon be replaced. The F-ST+ looks very sweet.

Isn't the F-ST+ being tested on the JPGA right now? Its titanium  with a non bore thru.

How does a non-bore thru play like vs a bore thru one?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...