Jump to content

TourStage F-ST+ Fairway Woods?


tk2000

Recommended Posts

Thanks FAQ

I checked out the online 2004 catalog, but I must be looking in the wrong place?

I can see the F-ST and F-HT fairway woods listed there, but I can't seem to locate the F-ST+ model. I think it's basically a non-bore thru version of the regular F-ST? I'm not sure?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks FAQ

I checked out the online 2004 catalog, but I must be looking in the wrong place?

I can see the F-ST and F-HT fairway woods listed there, but I can't seem to locate the F-ST+ model. I think it's basically a non-bore thru version of the regular F-ST? I'm not sure?

Isn't the F-ST+ being tested on the JPGA right now? Its titanium with a non bore thru.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I think the pics on pro support are of the F-HT+. From the Info I'm getting from the tour these are being tested on the JPGA and will be returned to Bridgestone's manufacturer for stress testing and quality issues to make sure the final product is durable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whichever model that may be, it appears to be deeper-faced than the current models? Although I understand why low profile fairway woods have been popular, I've always preferred a deeper face. Feels much more solid and more versatile to me. Alwyas thought that if a player had truoble generating height, the simple solution was to go for a higher loft.

Have to say that the wood in those pictures looks very sweet.

Chris, aside from the Fourteen proto driver which you've raved about, have you tried their fairway wood?

Didier

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have never tried the new Fourteen FW but from what I read it looks large from address and is geared toward the mid handicap level player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The current FS-T is not a pancake, like MR-23 and its not a DF, like an ERC wood.  I thought it was the perfect size, and I'm curious how they could improve it.

Same here...well, maybe if they were square instead of .5* closed. Still I'm pretty damned pleased with my original.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The current FS-T is not a pancake, like MR-23 and its not a DF, like an ERC wood.  I thought it was the perfect size, and I'm curious how they could improve it.

Same here...well, maybe if they were square instead of .5* closed. Still I'm pretty damned pleased with my original.

Didn't mean to imply that the F-ST was low-profile - should have started a new paragraph. I still play mine and am very happy with it as well although the face really gets marked up and it will soon be replaced. The F-ST+ looks very sweet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...