+TourSpecGolfer Posted April 27, 2011 Report Share Posted April 27, 2011 Land Rover stopped producing these in 1983. The schedule is 2013 for the concept and 2015 for the production model. have a look: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mjr. D Posted April 27, 2011 Report Share Posted April 27, 2011 Pretty cool. I'd rather have the G55 Mercedes but it's also probably 100K more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eca Posted April 27, 2011 Report Share Posted April 27, 2011 Pretty cool. I'd rather have the G55 Mercedes but it's also probably 100K more. Not my cuppa tea but i'd have it if its free :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shambles Posted April 28, 2011 Report Share Posted April 28, 2011 I like the looks but it's not a configuration for comfort or control. I'd be very interested in the engine. Rover does not have all that good a history of economy, efficiency or durability. The only thing I ever really liked about the Rover has been the aluminum body and the square shape. Shambles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMCMB Posted August 28, 2011 Report Share Posted August 28, 2011 Not a fan of boxy SUV's. J. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMCMB Posted August 28, 2011 Report Share Posted August 28, 2011 Not a fan of boxy SUV's J. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiromikey Posted May 29, 2012 Report Share Posted May 29, 2012 ...Rover does not have all that good a history of economy, efficiency or durability. The only thing I ever really liked about the Rover has been the aluminum body and the square shape.Shambles that's a very polite way of saying they're garbage...and you would be exactly right! my sport supercharged is the biggest piece of crap i've ever owned...but as you mentioned, they do look good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supo Posted May 29, 2012 Report Share Posted May 29, 2012 oh man id love this thing with a toyota engine! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleUK Posted May 29, 2012 Report Share Posted May 29, 2012 They nice, nice of you like breaking Down! Although the Defender was the more reliable out of the range! I can't remember which TV pundit said he'd rather have a Ten year old Toyota than a 2 year old Rover!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supo Posted May 29, 2012 Report Share Posted May 29, 2012 20 against one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shambles Posted May 29, 2012 Report Share Posted May 29, 2012 They nice, nice of you like breaking Down! Although the Defender was the more reliable out of the range! I can't remember which TV pundit said he'd rather have a Ten year old Toyota than a 2 year old Rover!! I doubt they are all that bad but admit they need more care and maintenance than a Toyota Landcruiser 80 series. The short wheel base gives it more maneuverability in tight spaces and, surprisingly, contributes to climbing ability. I understand that Rover got into the aluminum body construction because there was so much left over after the war. Much of the design consideration was based on the ability to build by hand and the need of farmers for a utility vehicle for general service as well as that of soldiers for romping about in places where roads were not available. At the time it was first built, it was arguably the best vehicle for general purposes that could fairly well be repaired or maintained with very few tools. I think, but am not sure, the Defender was what made the Land Rover a big name world wide. One of the better to me design aspects of the Defender was the fact that it is ambidextrous. These days off road vehcles are much more comfortable but also much more complicated. Shambles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swisstrader Posted May 29, 2012 Report Share Posted May 29, 2012 Love it!! Next beach car Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleUK Posted May 29, 2012 Report Share Posted May 29, 2012 Well I think with the range rover , range of vehicles , less is more! We have a defender 90 on the Farm and it's brilliant!! But would I have a RR Sport... Errr no ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackman Posted November 4, 2013 Report Share Posted November 4, 2013 Love the look but would never get one! Either the old crappy one or a really up to date one (not a Landy / Range) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_n Posted November 10, 2013 Report Share Posted November 10, 2013 this is one bad ass machine, a beauty Defender has stuck to its DNA and changed very little. This car looked almost the same over 20 years ago but the Jeep looks different from only a few years back. Just looking at the jeep, you can tell it is aimed more at the SUV class rather than a fully fledged off-roader. not really my style i'm more of a family station wagon with 552 hp, that is not a car it's a rocket Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.